Table 1.
Observed variables | 1. | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Boys ineligible for FRL and boys eligible for FRL
| ||||||||
Boys ineligible for FRLa | ||||||||
| ||||||||
M | SD | |||||||
|
||||||||
1. Letter-name fluency | – | .66 | .53 | .40 | .50 | .47 | 45.26 | 14.40 |
2. Letter-sound fluency | .75 | – | .60 | .49 | .53 | .54 | 40.45 | 16.74 |
3. Blending words | .52 | .55 | – | .56 | .52 | .50 | 10.91 | 4.27 |
4. Elision | .37 | .40 | .67 | – | .53 | .56 | 6.51 | 4.48 |
5. Spelling (real) | .49 | .54 | .67 | .60 | – | .83 | 23.88 | 8.58 |
6. Spelling (pseudo) | .54 | .54 | .60 | .56 | .77 | – | 14.12 | 6.66 |
Boys eligible for FRL c | 41.32 | 34.88 | 9.08 | 4.45 | 19.24 | 11.07 | ||
M | ||||||||
SD | 17.20 | 18.00 | 4.36 | 3.17 | 8.02 | 6.22 | ||
| ||||||||
Girls ineligible for FRL and girls eligible for FRL
| ||||||||
Girls ineligible for FRLb | ||||||||
| ||||||||
M | SD | |||||||
|
||||||||
1. Letter-name fluency | – | .63 | .41 | .24n | .38 | .33 | 52.65 | 15.18 |
2. Letter-sound fluency | .77 | – | .54 | .34 | .38 | .38 | 45.57 | 14.20 |
3. Blending words | .47 | .49 | – | .53 | .58 | .61 | 12.06 | 3.67 |
4. Elision | .49 | .42 | .61 | – | .60 | .67 | 6.55 | 3.97 |
5. Spelling (real) | .56 | .54 | .61 | .55 | – | .82 | 25.00 | 7.33 |
6. Spelling (pseudo) | .47 | .51 | .63 | .56 | .73 | – | 15.60 | 6.06 |
Girls eligible for FRL d | 47.56 | 39.81 | 9.55 | 4.87 | 21.30 | 12.28 | ||
M | ||||||||
SD | 19.93 | 17.78 | 4.03 | 3.53 | 6.63 | 5.40 | ||
| ||||||||
Totale – boys ineligible for FRL, girls ineligible for FRL, boys eligible for FRL, and girls eligible for FRL
| ||||||||
M | SD | |||||||
|
||||||||
1. Letter-name fluency | – | 45.31 | 17.89 | |||||
2. Letter-sound fluency | .74 | – | 38.79 | 17.57 | ||||
3. Blending words | .50 | .55 | – | 9.96 | 4.24 | |||
4. Elision | .40 | .43 | .62 | – | 5.20 | 3.74 | ||
5. Spelling (real) | .50 | .53 | .63 | .59 | – | 21.51 | 7.95 | |
6. Spelling (pseudo) | .48 | .52 | .61 | .60 | .80 | – | 12.64 | 6.24 |
Note: All values were significant at p < .01 except those markedn; FRL = free or reduced-price lunch;
n = 78;
n = 65;
n = 174;
n = 145;
total dataset N = 462; values above the diagonal are for children who were ineligible for FRL and the values below the diagonal are for children who were eligible for FRL.