Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Health. 2014 Mar 27;29(8):933–949. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.896916

Table 2.

Overview of framing main effects in six empirical message framing studies.

Study Health topic Operationalisation of risk Gain frame
n Loss frame
N Test statistics
M SD M SD
Study 1 Skin cancer protection Possibility of negative outcomes 4.10 1.67 143 4.12 1.78 139 F (1,274) = 0.019, p = .89, ηp2 = .00
Study 2 Hepatitis B vaccination Possibility of negative outcomes −0.01 1.02 276 0.06 0.97 266 F (1,534) = 1.83; p = .18, ηp2 = .00
Study 3 Physical activity Possibility of negative outcomes 5.76 0.06 332 5.73 0.06 326 F (1,654) = 0.07, p = .80, ηp2 = .00
Study 4 Breast self-examination Possibility of negative outcomes 4.77 1.38 350 4.86 1.41 335 F (1,681) = 0.29, p = .59, ηp2 = .00
Study 5 Vaccination Outcome uncertainty 2.43 1.26 40 3.25 2.00 40 F (1,76) = 5.20, p = .03, ηp2 = .06
Study 6 Vaccination Outcome uncertainty + possibility of negative outcomes 4.68 1.57 62 4.63 1.56 63 F (1,121) = 0.02, p = .90, ηp2 = .00