Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;10(3):e0118836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118836

Table 2. Distribution of missing responses to individual items among all study participants prior to exploratory factor analysis (n = 85).

Berger HIV Stigma Scale Van Rie HIV-related Stigma Scale
Enacted stigma Disclosure concerns Negative self-image Concern with public attitudes Felt/ experienced stigma b Perceived community stigma
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Item 1 8 (9.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) a 0 (0.0) 4 (4.7) a
Item 2 7 (8.2) 1 (1.2) 0 (0.0) 2 (2.4) 1 (1.2) 8 (9.4)
Item 3 5 (5.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 10 (11.8) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2)
Item 4 4 (4.7) 2 (2.4) 1 (1.2) 0 (0.0) a 1 (1.2) 3 (3.5)
Item 5 9 (10.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) c 1 (1.2) a
Item 6 6 (7.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2) 1 (1.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.2)
Item 7 11 (12.9) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (2.4)
Item 8 6 (7.1) 1 (1.2) a 0 (0.0)
Item 9 2 (2.4) a 4 (4.7) a 0 (0.0)
Item 10 6 (7.1) a 0 (0.0) 5 (5.9)
Item 11 5 (5.9) a 2 (2.4) a
Complete responses to all items 62 (72.9) 83 (97.7) 83 (97.7) 74 (87.1) 80 (94.1) 71 (83.5)
Missing 1 item only 10 (11.8) 1 (1.2) 2 (2.4) 10 (11.8) 4 (4.7) 7 (8.2)
Missing 2 items 2 (2.4) 1 (1.2) 5 (5.9)
Missing 3 items 1 (1.2) 1 (1.2) 1 (1.2) 1 (1.2)
Missing 4+ items 10 (11.8) 1 (1.2)

a item excluded from revised set of items following exploratory factor analysis.

b The original version of this sub-scale contained 10 items and has was termed the “Patient perspective” or “Felt/Experienced stigma” sub-scale.

c item excluded a priori before exploratory factor analysis (see Methods).