Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 4;10(3):e0118769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118769

Table 3. Comparison of tumor extent defined by 18F-FLT uptake in PET image and abnormal signal change on MR image.

Outcomes N (%)
18F-FLT uptake corresponding exactly to contrast-enhancement 2 (10.53%)
18F-FLT uptake beyond abnormal contrast-enhancement 14 (73.68%)
Abnormal contrast-enhancement beyond 18F-FLT uptake 16 (84.21%)
18F-FLT uptake corresponding exactly to hyperintensity areas 0 (0%)
18F-FLT uptake beyond hyper-intensity areas 8 (42.11%)
Hyper-intensity areas beyond 18F-FLT uptake 19 (100%)