Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 15;5(5):530–544. doi: 10.7150/thno.10824

Table 2.

Diagnostic-prognostic implications of NG2/CSPG4 expression in hematological malignancies1

Leukemia Age group NG2/CSPG4 positive cases2
(out of n)
NG2/CSPG4 positivity vs prevalent FAB status/Phenotype
of MLL rearranged cases
NG2/CSPG4 positivity in MLL germline cases
(out of n)
NG2/CSPG4 positivity in MLL rearranged cases
(out of n)
Disease course References
ALL Infant 9% (104) 56% pro-B; 33% pre-B; 11% T-ALL 0% (89) 100% (9) ND 96
AML Infant 11% (166) 67% M5 0% (85) 78% (18) Poor 95
AML Infant 35% (37) 58% M4/M5 0% (13) 54% (24) Unaffected 97
AML Infant/Adult 43% (14) 75% M5 0% (25) 43% (14) ND 98
AML/
ALL
Infant/Adult 14% (533) NS
25% myeloid/NK cell ALL; 16% pro-/pre-B- ALL
2% (12) 81% (72) ND 99
ALL Adult 23% (313) 78 pro-B, 11% pre-B 19% (48) 89% (72) ND 102
AML/
ALL
Infant 82% (11) NS ND 100% (9) Poor 103
ALL Adult 95% (184) 100% pro-/pre-B 15% (66) 91% (118) ND 104
AML Adult 23% (70) 50% M5 29% (62) 63% (8) Poor 107
AML/
ALL
Infant 48% (311) NS
90% pro-B, 6% T-ALL
58% (143) 42% (143) ND 100

1As established by flow cytometry using the reference mAb 7.1;

2Adopted average cut-off was >25% of leukemic blasts;

3NG2/CSPG4 expression has also been documented in one case of DC2/NK cell ALL 105;

Abbreviations: NS = not specified; ND = not determined.