Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Sep 16;114(2):273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.008

Table 2.

Predicted and estimated resting energy expenditure for middle-age overweight/obese individuals participating in a study comparing energy assessment methods

Males Females Total
mean ± standard deviation
MREEa 1,873.5±309.3 1,524.6±226.2 1,615.8±292.6
MRQb 0.90±0.1 0.86±0.07 0.87±0.1
MVCO2c 237.0±58.6 185.6±29.3 199.0±44.9
MVO2d 262.3±41.1 215.9±33.4 228.0±40.9
PREEe 1,898.4±251.4 1,529.2±134.1 1,625.7±236.3
MedGemf 2,023.9±367.1 1,621.8±255.3 1,726.9±337.0
Comparison of methods mean difference
MedGem vs MREE 150.4 97.2*** 111.1***
PREE vs MREE 24.9 4.6 9.9
MedGem vs PREE 125.5 92.6*** 101.2***
a

MREE=measured resting energy expenditure using traditional indirect calorimeter (kcal/24 h).

b

MRQ=measured respiratory quotient as determined with the traditional indirect calorimeter.

c

MVCO2=measured carbon dioxide eliminated as determined with the traditional indirect calorimeter.

d

MVO2=measured oxygen consumption as determined with the traditional indirect calorimeter.

e

PREE=predicted resting energy expenditure using the Harris-Benedict equation (kcal/24 h).

f

MedGem=use of MedGem (HealthETech) portable, handheld calorimeter to measure resting energy expenditure (kcal/24 h).

P=0.053.

***

P<0.001.