Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 11;22(5):1071–1077. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr006

Table 1.

Demographics of patients with oropharynx cancer treated on TAX 324

HPV+ (N = 56, 50%), n (%) HPV− (N = 55, 50%), n (%) HPV tested (N = 111), n (%) No HPV status (N = 153), n (%) P valuea P valueb
Treatment
    TPF 28 (50) 26 (47) 54 (49) 78 (51) 0.85 0.80
    PF 28 (50) 29 (53) 57 (51) 75 (49)
Sex
    Male 45 (80) 44 (80) 89 (80) 130 (85) 1.0 0.32
    Female 11 (20) 11 (20) 22 (20) 23 (15)
Ethnicity
    White 54 (96) 46 (84) 100 (90) 130 (86) 0.03 0.22
    Black 1 (2) 7 (13) 8 (7) 11 (7)
    Other 1 (2) 2 (4) 3 (3) 12 (8)
Age (years), median (range) 54 (39–71) 58 (41–78) 55 (39–78) 55 (38–78) 0.02 1.0
Operability
    Unresectable 14 (25) 25 (46) 39 (35) 65 (42) 0.04 0.005
    Low curability 16 (29) 16 (29) 32 (29) 60 (39)
    Organ preservation 26 (46) 14 (26) 40 (36) 28 (18)
Nodal stage
    N0–N1 13 (23) 18 (33) 31 (28) 39 (25) 0.30 0.67
    N2–N3 43 (77) 43 (77) 80 (72) 114 (75)
T stage
    T1–T2 28 (49) 11 (20) 39 (35) 42 (27) 0.001 0.22
    T3–T4 28 (51) 44 (80) 72 (65) 110 (72)
    TX 0 0 0 1 (1)
Clinical stage
    III 10 (18) 5 (9) 15 (14) 19 (12) 0.27 0.85
    IV 46 (82) 50 (91) 96 (86) 133 (87)
    NA 1 (1)
WHO PS
    0 43 (77) 27 (49) 70 (63) 85 (56) 0.003 0.31
    1 13 (23) 28 (51) 41 (37) 66 (43)
    NA 2 (1)
a

Exact two-sided P value for testing null hypothesis of no difference in parameter’s distribution between HPV+ and HPV− patients.

b

Exact two-sided P value for testing null hypothesis of no difference in parameter’s distribution between patients with HPV status assessed and those without evaluable tissues.

HPV, human papillomavirus; T, tumor; WHO PS, World Health Organization performance status.