. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Soc Pers Relat. 2014 Mar 26;32(2):197–221. doi: 10.1177/0265407514528101

Table 1.

Bivariate correlations among study variables.

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1. Alcohol condition	—
2. Sexual precedence	−.03	—
3. Relationship orientation	−.03	−.04	—
4. Primary relationship appraisals	−.18^*	.06	.11	—
5. Primary sex appraisals	.05	.21^**	−.03	.42^**	—
6. Secondary relationship appraisals	−.05	.04	.02	.31^**	.33^**	—
7. Secondary appraisals for sex without a condom	.03	.16^*	−.01	.12	.20^**	.26^*^	—
8. Lack of relationship-related condom negotiation	−.04	.12	−.05	.13	.10	.04	.44^**	—
9. Lack of assertive condom negotiation	−.07	.23^**	.02	.15	.12	.14	.58^**	.75^**	—
10. Likelihood of sex without a condom	.09	.25^**	.01	.17^*	.23^**	.26^*^	.68^**	.58^**	.72^**	—

Note. N = 156. Alcohol condition was coded as 0 (no alcohol consumed) and 1 (alcohol consumed). Sexual precedence condition and relationship motivation are centered.

^**

p < .01

p < .05.