. 2015 Mar 6;6:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00145

Table 4.

Correlations between STM, articulation rate, and attentional capacity measures in Experiment 2.

	STM 2-syll. vis.	STM 4-syll. vis.	STM 2-syll. aud.	STM 4-syll. aud.	Art. rate 2 syll.	Art. rate 4 syll.	CSVI	DFT	FIT
STM 2-syll. vis.	1	0.60^*	0.58	0.46^*	0.32^°	0.24^°	0.40^*	0.37^*	0.05
STM 4-syll. vis.		1	0.49^*	0.44^*	0.39^*	0.32^°	0.34^*	0.43^*	0.07
STM 2-syll. aud.			1	0.61^*	0.30^°	0.26^°	0.19	0.47^*	0.10
STM 4-syll. aud.				1	0.38^*	0.31^°	0.15	0.38^*	0.14
Art. rate 2-syll.					1	0.78^*	0.18	0.21^°	0.16
Art. rate 4-syll.						1	0.13	0.17	0.13
CSVI							1	0.30^°	0.17
DFT								1	0.29^°
FIT									1

N = 102 for all measures.

p < 0.001;

^°

p < 0.05, two-tailed.