Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;6:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00145

Table 7.

Observed and expected STM span variances in Experiment 2, by word length, presentation modality, and participants' M-capacity.

Modality Word length M-capacity Obs. variance Exp. variance χ2 d.f. p
Visual 2 syllables e + 5 0.92 0.84 62.13 55 n.s.
Visual 2 syllables e + 6 0.77 1.10 73.74 103 <0.05
Visual 2 syllables e + 7 1.31 1.38 137.16 142 n.s.
Visual 4 syllables e + 5 0.95 0.30 179.53 55 <0.001
Visual 4 syllables e + 6 0.67 0.54 130.85 103 n.s.
Visual 4 syllables e + 7 0.91 0.72 180.76 142 <0.05
Auditory 2 syllables e + 5 0.60 0.98 34.79 55 <0.05
Auditory 2 syllables e + 6 0.67 1.22 57.44 103 <0.001
Auditory 2 syllables e + 7 1.14 1.49 109.48 142 <0.05
Auditory 4 syllables e + 5 0.74 0.55 76.58 55 n.s.
Auditory 4 syllables e + 6 0.67 0.79 89.92 103 n.s.
Auditory 4 syllables e + 7 0.99 1.00 142.94 142 n.s.

The p-values for chi-square tests are two-tailed, because the model could either underestimate or overestimate the variance of span scores.