Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Ther. 2013 Nov 8;30(11):967–986. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0068-6

Table 3.

Summary of meta-analyses/systematic reviews of hylans/hyaluronic acids (Has) in knee osteoarthritis

References Lo et al.
[63]
Wang et al.
[62]
Arrich et al.
[65]
Bellamy et al.
[61]
Bannuru et al.
[119]
Colen et al.
[64]
Rutjes
et al. [36]
Total number of trials 22 20 22 76 49 74 70
Efficacy outcomes (HA versus placebo) ES (change from baseline) SPED, normalized to % change Mean difference, SPID WMD in pain during/ after exercise (VAS) Overall pain, pain at different time points: 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 weeks MCID, pain MCID, pain intensity and safety
Summary of pooled results ES: 0.32 (P< 0.001) SPID 7.9% (95% CI 4.1–11.7%) WMD 10–14 week: −4.3 mm (P= 0.013) WMD 22–30 week: −7.1 mm (P= 0.013) % change 5–13 week: +26% for pain; +23% for function Peak ES at 8 weeks: 0.46 (95% CI 0.28–0.65) WMD: −10.20 (95% CI −15.97 to −4.42) ES: −0.37 (95% CI −0.46 to −0.28)
Conclusion Small treatment effect Significant improvement in pain Not effective in measured outcomes Effective treatment for pain, function, and patient global assessment at 5–13 week Modest efficacy for knee pain Further studies needed to determine efficacy of HA Small, clinically irrelevant benefit

ES effect size, MCID minimal clinically important difference, SPID sum of pain intensity differences, VAS visual analog scale, WMD weighted mean difference