Table 3.
References | Lo et al. [63] |
Wang et al. [62] |
Arrich et al. [65] |
Bellamy et al. [61] |
Bannuru et al. [119] |
Colen et al. [64] |
Rutjes et al. [36] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of trials | 22 | 20 | 22 | 76 | 49 | 74 | 70 |
Efficacy outcomes (HA versus placebo) | ES (change from baseline) | SPED, normalized to % change | Mean difference, SPID | WMD in pain during/ after exercise (VAS) | Overall pain, pain at different time points: 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 weeks | MCID, pain | MCID, pain intensity and safety |
Summary of pooled results | ES: 0.32 (P< 0.001) | SPID 7.9% (95% CI 4.1–11.7%) | WMD 10–14 week: −4.3 mm (P= 0.013) WMD 22–30 week: −7.1 mm (P= 0.013) | % change 5–13 week: +26% for pain; +23% for function | Peak ES at 8 weeks: 0.46 (95% CI 0.28–0.65) | WMD: −10.20 (95% CI −15.97 to −4.42) | ES: −0.37 (95% CI −0.46 to −0.28) |
Conclusion | Small treatment effect | Significant improvement in pain | Not effective in measured outcomes | Effective treatment for pain, function, and patient global assessment at 5–13 week | Modest efficacy for knee pain | Further studies needed to determine efficacy of HA | Small, clinically irrelevant benefit |
ES effect size, MCID minimal clinically important difference, SPID sum of pain intensity differences, VAS visual analog scale, WMD weighted mean difference