Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Community Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;38(2):169–179. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000069

Table 2.

Multinomial logistic regression of neighborhood characteristics and three patterns of adherence (n= 179).

Adherent vs. Nonadherent OR [95% CI] Increasing Adherence vs. Non adherence OR [95% CI]
Neighborhood characteristics

High social affluence, high residential stability, and high neighborhood advantage (n=41) 8.48* [1.71, 42.02] 12.91* [2.20, 75.80]
High social affluence and high neighborhood advantage (n=36) 2.44 [0.67, 8.86] 1.61 [0.35, 7.54]
High residential stability and high neighborhood advantage (n=10) 4.05 [0.28, 57.60] 1.86 [0.12, 28.54]
High social affluence and high residential stability (n=12) 1.78 [0.29, 10.75] 0.50 [0.05, 5.56]
One or fewer high features present: stability, affluence, or advantage (n=80) 1.00 1.00

Note: OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval

*

p< .05

All estimates are adjusted for age, ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, financial status, employment, frequency of medication administration, number of medical conditions, cognitive status, practice, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), depression, and intervention condition.