Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct 11;97(12):7644–7654. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8521

Table 2.

Distribution of antimicrobial drug use [% (no.)] of individual calves as documented in farm records and displayed by calf housing type and order of treatment after birth

Description IP1
GP2
First treatment Second treatment Third treatment First treatment Second treatment Third treatment
Any drug3 38 (63) 18 (31) 9 (14) 16 (55) 6 (19) 1 (3)
Distribution of antimicrobial drug use by treatment order:
 β-Lactam, 79 (50) 35 (11) 7 (1) 12 (7)
 Penicillin G 17 (11) 6 (2)
 Ampicillin 12 (7)
 Ceftiofur 62 (39) 29 (9) 7 (1)
 Fluoroquinolones 3 (2) 6 (2) 21 (3) 49 (27) 47 (9) 66 (2)
 Enrofloxacin 3 (2) 6 (2) 21 (3) 49 (27) 47 (9) 66 (2)
 Macrolides 11 (7) 58 (18) 43 (6) 23 (13) 53 (10)
 Tulathromycin 11 (7) 55 (17) 36 (5) 23 (13) 53 (10)
 Tylosin 3 (1) 7 (1)
 Phenicols 9 (6) 44 (1)
 Florfenicol 9 (6) 44 (1)
 Tetracyclines 2 (1)
 Oxytetracycline 2 (1)
 Sulfonamide 30 (4)
 Sulfamethazine 30 (4)
Median age at treatment, d (range) 9 (0–57) 12 (6–46) 19 (7–46) 20 (3–37) 29 (15–49) 37 (32–43)
1

Calves housed in individual pens, fed milk or milk replacer (n = 164).

2

Calves housed in group pens, fed acidified milk ad libitum (n = 315).

3

Percent and number of calves receiving any antimicrobial drug treatment.