Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Dairy Sci. 2014 Oct 11;97(12):7644–7654. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8521

Table 4.

Isolate level effect of antimicrobial treatment of calves on prevalence of nonsusceptible Escherichia coli

Antimicrobial treatment Age1
Class2 Enrofloxacin treatment3
Ceftiofur treatment3
P-value Tx, % (n = 152) NoTx, % (n = 1,271) P-value Odds ratio4 Tx, % (n = 144) NoTx, % (n = 1,279) P-value Odds ratio4
Ceftriaxone 0.0002 S 34 40 0.3 3 43 0.08
NS 66 60 0.8 (0.5–1) 97 57 3 (0.9–12)
Neomycin <0.0001 S 65 68 0.7 62 68 0.05
NS 35 32 0.9 (0.6–1) 38 32 0.5 (0.3–1)
Ciprofloxacin 0.0003 S 80 97 0.005 98 95 0.31
NS 20 3 2.0 (1–4) 2 5 4 (0.3–58)
Nalidixic acid <0.0001 S 73 96 <0.0001 94 94 0.08
NS 27 4 3.0 (2–6) 6 6 6 (0.8–42)
1

Categorical age group variable with animals grouped by age in days: 3 to 14 d (AGE-1), 15 to 35 d (AGE-2), and 36 to 65 d (AGE-3).

2

S = susceptible; NS = nonsusceptible.

3

E. coli from a calf with a farm record of treatment at least once with the referred antimicrobial drug from birth to rectal swab sampling (Tx) or from a calf with a farm record showing no treatment with the referred antimicrobial drug from birth to rectal swab sampling (NoTx).

4

Odds ratio for isolation of a nonsusceptible E. coli in the drug-treated group compared with the not-treated group. The 95% confidence interval is in parentheses.