Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Z Angew Math Mech. 2013 Aug 26;95(2):215–234. doi: 10.1002/zamm.201300071

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Comparison of creep response under confined and unconfined conditions for same applied stress and external bath molarity: strain and effective stress (a, b and d), pore pressures (c and e), porosity (f), volume change (g), material properties (h–l), and the fiber stress distributions (m).