Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 27;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0013-4

Table 2.

Summary of outcomes of clinical trials utilizing SR for diabetes and weight control

FBS (mg/dl) Pre intervention Post intervention HbA1C (%) Pre intervention Post intervention BMI (Kg/m2) Pre intervention Post intervention
Kajimoto et al. (2000) [28] Group A SRE 140 + − 14.6 125.7 + −18.6* 6.6 + − 0.2 6.52 + − 0.67 24.1 + − 4.4 23.5 + − 3.8*
Placebo 125.7 + − 18.6 (CO) 131.6 + − 22.4* 6.59 + − 0.65 23.5 + − 3.8 (CO) 23.5 + − 3.8
Group B SRE 139 + − 12.2 120 + − 16* 6.6 + − 0.2 6.46 + − 0.38* 22.8 + − 0.8 22.3 + − 2.4*
Placebo 139 + −20.4 6.60 + − 0.4 22.7 + − 2.5
Jayawardena et al. (2005) [29] SR - - 6.8 + −0.9 6.29 + − 1.02* - -
Placebo - - 6.8 + − 0.9 6.65 + − 1.04 - -
Shivaprasad et al. (2013) [30] SR Root bark 115.2 + − 1.35 98.4 + −2.96* - - - -
SR Leaves 115.5 + − 1.43 95.9 + − 2.5* (At 6 weeks)
Placebo 116.1 + − 1.76 109.2 + − .5 (At 6 weeks) - - - -
Ofner et al. (2013) [31] SR (Group B) - - - - 31.2 + − 4.7 29.3 + −4.5*
Exercise only (Group A) - - - - 30.0 + − 5.3 29.4 + − 9.7

*denotes a statistical significance of P <0.05.

CO: at crossover.