Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0117688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117688

Table 3. Rotation-only registration results for corresponding point sets with anisotropic noise present in both sets of points. (Experiment 1C).

Rot. (deg.) Alg. Iter. Runtime RE Inst.
[0, 15] Isotropic 1.0 0.0000 0.304 0
Kanatani 4.0 0.0025 0.279 0
Proposed 3.8 0.0013 0.278 0
[15, 45] Isotropic 1.0 0.0000 0.292 0
Kanatani 4.0 0.0025 0.283 0
Proposed 4.4 0.0015 0.269 0
[45, 90] Isotropic 1.0 0.0000 0.295 0
Kanatani 4.0 0.0025 0.313 0
Proposed 5.1 0.0017 0.271 0
[90, 150] Isotropic 1.0 0.0000 0.292 0
Kanatani 4.5 0.0028 0.323 0
Proposed 6.3 0.0020 0.265 0
[150, 180] Isotropic 1.0 0.0000 0.286 0
Kanatani 6.1 0.0038 0.360 10
Proposed 8.7 0.0028 0.263 0

Results report the efficiency (number of iterations and runtime (seconds)), registration error (RE) (mm), and instability (% of trials) of the GTLS method proposed in this paper (modified to computer only rotation) compared to the closed-form isotropic solution [26] and the prior GTLS rotation estimation method of Ohta and Kanatani [28]. The tests are binned according to the magnitude of initial misalignment in rotation (degrees) with translational misalignment being zero; each bin represents average values measured over 1000 randomized trials.