. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Nov 4;12(3):261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.001

Table 3.

Multiple regressions predicting intentions for ultrasound with insurance coverage, without insurance coverage, and future mammograms

	B	SE B	β	p	Adjusted R²

Ultrasounds with insurance coverage
		Total Model		<.001	.16

Constant	13.72	1.29		<.001
Anxiety	.20	.05	.32	<.001
Ambiguity Aversion	−.18	.05	−.23	.001
Perceived complexity	−.72	.23	−.23	.002
Decision Making Role^*	.64	.26	.17	.013

Ultrasounds without insurance coverage
		Total Model		<.001	.18

Constant	9.57	3.20		.003
Minority status	2.43	.84	.20	.004
Age	−.10	.04	−.18	.01
Health Care System Distrust	.14	.05	.19	.007
Anxiety	.11	.06	.13	.052
Ambiguity Aversion	−.23	.07	−.22	.002
Decision Making Role^*	.83	.34	.17	.02

Future mammograms
		Total Model		<.001	.21

Constant	8.90	2.13		<.001
Health Care System Distrust	.16	.04	.25	<.001
Anxiety	.18	.05	.24	.001
Ambiguity Aversion	−.23	.06	−.25	<.001
Perceived complexity	−.59	.27	−.15	.03
Decision Making Role^*	.83	.29	.19	.004

Higher scores on decision-making role indicates preference for a passive decision making role