Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 22;2015:970398. doi: 10.1155/2015/970398

(c) Meat quality

Parameters Treatment groups
Nutritional feed only
(T1)
0.5% w/w of MOLM
(T2)
1.0% w/w of MOLM
(T3)
1.5% w/w of MOLM
(T4)
Cooking loss (%) 21.99 ± 0.464a 16.62 ± 0.619b 21.66 ± 1.441a 20.34 ± 1.141a
Drip loss (%) 5.72 ± 0.027d 5.94 ± 0.028c 8.01 ± 0.034a 7.74 ± 0.065b
Lightness 46.70 ± 1.193b 46.24 ± 0.373b 51.70 ± 0.827a 47.25 ± 0.513b
Redness 6.15 ± 0.583ab 7.93 ± 0.793a 5.45 ± 0.450b 6.64 ± 0.497ab
Yellowness 12.08 ± 0.604b 13.52 ± 0.384ab 13.15 ± 0.537ab 14.24 ± 0.584a
Tenderness 1.07 ± 0.1a 1.23 ± 0.19a 0.94 ± 0.07a 0.89 ± 0.007a

Table 2(a) (growth performance): the final body weight, weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality (*a, b values for final body weight, weight gain, and feed intake showing different superscripts within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05) and the *a, b, bc, and c within rows of the FCR are significantly different (P < 0.05)). Table 2(b) (carcass characteristics): the dressing percentage and meat : bone : fat ratio (*a, b, c, and d values for dressing percentage and meat : bone : fat ratio within rows are significantly different (P < 0.05)). Table 2(c) (meat quality): the cooking loss, drip loss, color, and tenderness (*a, b, c, d values with different superscripts on the same row are significantly different (P < 0.05)), of broiler chicken fed with various gradients of Moringa oleifera leaves meal (0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% w/w) MOLM with/without nutritional feed.