Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 5;350:h468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h468

Table 4.

 Comparison of primary and secondary outcomes at six and 12 month follow-up assessments

Outcome by follow-up Intervention Control Difference in adjusted means (95% CI)† P value† Group×time interaction
Adjusted mean* (SE) No Adjusted mean* (SE) No
Primary
Barthel index‡:
 6 months 4.78 (0.20) 525 4.78 (0.22) 448 0.004 (−0.52 to 0.53) 0.99 0.35
 12 months 3.93 (0.21) 512 3.77 (0.22) 430 0.16 (−0.40 to 0.72) 0.58
Secondary
Rivermead mobility index:
 6 months 2.64 (0.11) 421 2.67 (0.12) 346 −0.03 (−0.33 to 0.27) 0.84 0.23
 12 months 2.19 (0.13) 354 2.46 (0.14) 271 −0.26 (−0.62 to 0.09) 0.15
Geriatric depression scale-15:
 6 months 6.20 (0.21) 338 6.68 (0.22) 284 −0.48 (−1.04 to 0.09) 0.10 0.57
 12 months 6.22 (0.22) 297 6.40 (0.25) 219 −0.18 (−0.80 to 0.43) 0.56
EQ-5D-3L§:
 6 months 0.22 (0.02) 363 0.23 (0.02) 315 −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.04) 0.72 0.56
 12 months 0.20 (0.02) 316 0.18 (0.02) 244 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07) 0.48

*Adjusted by care home as a random effect, and baseline score, type of care home and centre as fixed effects.

†Tukey-Kramer adjusted confidence intervals and P values.

‡Participants who died before follow-up are given a Barthel score of zero.

§EuroQol group 5-dimension self report questionnaire (three levels).