Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr 16;65(6):371–378. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.036913

Table 3.

Cohort studies of benzene exposure and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)

Author, year
(Reference)
RR CIlow CIup N Location/
industry
Exposure Exposure
category
Self-
report
Outcome All cause
SMR
Adj
RR
Adj
CIlow
Adj
CIup
Bloemen et al 20049 2.15 0.44 6.28 3 Michigan/
Chemical
Any exposure >10 yrs,
15 yr lag
High No NHL SMR 0.90 2.39 0.45 5.87
Collins et al 200325 1.80 0.40 5.10 3 Illinois/Chemical >40 days exposed
>100 ppm
High No NHL SMR 1.00 1.81 0.34 4.44
Hayes et al 19971 4.70 1.20 18.10 7 China/Multiple Average exposure
≥25 ppm
High No NHL incidence na* na na na
Rinsky et al 20028 0.96 0.31 2.25 5 Ohio/Rubber ≥1 ppm-day All No NHL SMR 0.98 0.98 0.31 2.03
Sorahan et al 20052 1.00 0.64 1.49 24 UK/Multiple Identified by companies
as being exposed to
benzene
All Yes NHL incidence 1.07 0.93 0.60 1.34
Wong 198726 1.51 0.02 8.40 1 Multiple/Chemical Continuous exposure,
cumulative exposure
>720 ppm-mo
High No LR SMR 0.63 2.39 0.00 9.38

Adj, adjusted for the healthy worker effect; CIlow, lower 95% CI; CIup, upper 95% CI; exposure, the exposure category selected for this meta-analysis; exposure category, described as “High” if results for a high exposure category were used; LR, lymphosarcoma and reticulosarcoma; N, number of cases in the selected exposure category; SMR, standardised mortality ratio; Self-report, “Yes” means exposure history based primarily on self-reported work history.

*

Internal comparison group used in Hayes et al 1997 so the healthy worker effect adjustment was not done.