Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health Dent. 2011 May 31;71(4):289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00271.x

Table 4.

Negative binomial GLMM regression results* for assessing the associations between new non-cavitated and cavitated caries and dietary variables (156 subjects)

Variable New Non-cavitated Caries** New Cavitated Caries***

Est.§ exp (Est.)£ p-value Est.§ exp (Est.)£ p-value

Powdered Beverages (Overall p-value) (0.72) (0.003)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.11 0.90 0.61 −0.64 0.53 0.005
  • High 0.07 1.07 0.74 0.15 1.16 0.52

Regular Soda Pop (Overall p-value) (0.55) (0.25)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.25 0.78 0.28 0.40 1.49 0.12
  • High −0.14 0.87 0.62 0.19 1.21 0.54

Juice Drinks (Overall p-value) (0.72) (0.72)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.17 0.84 0.46 0.15 1.16 0.54
  • High −0.18 0.83 0.48 0.22 1.25 0.42

100% Juice (Overall p-value) (0.003) (<0.0001)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.31 0.73 0.15 0.21 1.23 0.35
  • High −1.03 0.36 0.0007 −1.12 0.33 0.0005

Milk (Overall p-value) (0.72) (0.33)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.06 0.94 0.79 0.05 1.05 0.84
  • High −0.22 0.80 0.44 0.36 1.43 0.21

Water by Itself (Overall p-value) (0.65) (0.53)

  • Low 0 1 Ref. 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle 0.08 1.08 0.72 −0.03 0.97 0.91
  • High −0.12 0.89 0.66 0.23 1.26 0.43
*

Each row for the non-cavitated (second column) and for cavitated caries (fourth column) was from a separate regression model, with each beverage intake frequency treated as a categorical (3-level) variable.

**

Transitions are from sound to non-cavitated lesions.

***

Transitions are from sound/non-cavitated caries lesions to cavitated caries or filled lesions.

§

β estimates

£

Exponentiation of the estimates