Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health Dent. 2011 May 31;71(4):289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00271.x

Table 6.

Multivariable negative binomial GLMM regression results for assessing the associations between new non-cavitated caries and related factors 151 subjects)

Variable New Non-cavitated Caries*
(d1s/D1S)

Est.§ exp (Est.)£ p-value

100% Juice Exposure Level (overall p-value) (0.041)
  • Low 0 1 Ref.
  • Middle −0.47 0.63 0.042
  • High −0.69 0.50 0.02

Tooth Brushing Frequency −0.40 0.67 0.044

Proportion of New Cavitated Caries Lesions to Surfaces at Risk (10% change) 0.74 2.10 0.004

SES
  • Low/middle 0 1 Ref.
  • High −0.55 0.58 0.02

Dentition (overall p-value) (0.17)
  • Primary Dentition (Exam 1) 0 1 Ref.
  • Mixed Dentition (Exam 2) 0.43 1.54 0.08
  • Permanent Dentition (Exam 3) 0.37 1.45 0.13
*

Transitions are from sound to non-cavitated lesions.

§

β estimates

£

Exponentiation of the estimates

Note: p<0.05 to be retained, except dentition type, a control variable.