Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;2015:307594. doi: 10.1155/2015/307594

Table 3.

Free radical scavenging activities and reducing power of EECP and EEPG.

Samplea DPPH (IC50) ABTS (IC50) RP (mmol TE/g) SRSA (mmol TE/g) ORAC (mmol TE/g)
EECP 32.35NS ± 2.84 40.5** ± 2.38 2.08** ± 0.08 1.52** ± 0.03 9.25* ± 0.85
EEPG 31.83 ± 2.68 55.4 ± 1.49 1.55 ± 0.05 0.67 ± 0.02 6.43 ± 0.46

aData are showed as the mean ± SD (n = 3); statistical analysis were used to compare EECP with EEPG for every index, separately. NS means not significant (P > 0.05); *means significant (P < 0.05); **means very significant (P < 0.01). DPPH and ABTS are expressed as IC50 (μg/mL); FRAP, SRSA, and ORAC are expressed as millimoles Trolox equivalents (TE) per gram of sample.