Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 22;25:14112. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.112

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Difference in (a) birthweight and (b) gestational age between PQ and GP data versus GP data. For clarity, GP data were used as baseline and are thus plotted on the x axis, rather than the mean of GP and PQ data. Solid horizontal line represents the bias (i.e., mean difference) of the two methods, whereas dotted lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) between the two methods. Bold solid vertical lines indicate critical cutoffs of <2.5 kg and <37 weeks, which were used to categorise children having low birth weight or born preterm, respectively, according to GPs. ▲ symbols indicate children who would have been ‘misclassified’ as having normal birth weight (n=6) or born full term (n=8) if based on PQs rather than GP records. Δ symbols indicate children who would be potentially ‘misclassified’ as having low birth weight (n=11) or born preterm (n=4) if based on PQs rather than GP data. The outliers indicated by *, which obviously indicate misreporting by either PQ or GPs, have been excluded from the analyses. GP, general practitioner; PQ, parental questionnaire.