Table 2.
Treatment | DA | DOPAC | 3-MT | HVA | HVA/DA | DOPAC/DA | 3-MT/DA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a: Salsolinol—acute | |||||||
Control | 9,042 ± 1,054 | 1,238 ± 62 | 438 ± 48 | 675 ± 113 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 14 ± 2 | 4.8 ± 0.2 |
Salsolinol | 9,457 ± 1,008 | 1,584 ± 227** | 689 ± 384 | 897 ± 281 | 11 ± 3** | 16 ± 2* | 5.1 ± 0.5 |
t | −0.70 | −3.60 | −1.57 | −1.82 | −6.28 | −2.32 | −1.02 |
df | 10 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
P | N.S. | P ≤ 0.01 | N.S. | N.S. | P ≤ 0.01 | P < 0.05 | N.S. |
b: Salsolinol—chronic, 2h withdrawal | |||||||
Control | 10,439 ± 815 | 1467 ± 131 | 554 ± 58 | 1,149 ± 83 | 11 ± 1.3 | 14 ± 2 | 5.3 ± 0.5 |
Salsolinol | 11,415 ± 1044 | 1,789 ± 327* | 514 ± 26 | 1,377 ± 296 | 12 ± 2.1 | 16 ± 2 | 4.5 ± 0.5* |
t | −1.95 | −2.42 | 1.65 | −1.96 | −1.03 | −1.52 | 2.77 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
P | N.S. | P < 0.05 | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | P < 0.05 |
c: Salsolinol—chronic, 24h withdrawal | |||||||
Control | 13,843 ± 1,626 | 1,728 ± 178 | 665 ± 62 | 1,263 ± 179 | 9 ± 2 | 13 ± 1 | 4.8 ± 0.3 |
Salsolinol | 13,808 ± 1,222 | 1,719 ± 312 | 679 ± 127 | 1,169 ± 405 | 8 ± 2 | 12 ± 1 | 4.9 ± 0.8 |
t | 0.05 | 0.06 | −0.26 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.25 | −0.30 |
df | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
P | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. |
Control group received saline. Salsolinol was administrated in a dose 100 mg/kg i.p. once (acute) or for 14 consecutive days (chronic); N = 6–8 animals per group. The concentrations of dopamine and its metabolites were measured in ng/g wet tissue. The data are the mean ± SD. Following Shapiro–Wilk test, for normality, the data were compared using Student’s t test for independent group (control vs. salsolinol 100 mg/kg group). The null hypothesis of the lack of differences between the investigated groups was adopted (P > 0.05). The alternative hypothesis commanded the existence of differences between groups; statistical significance: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01