(a,b) Systemic administration of the selective mGlu5R antagonist MTEP (open triangle;
3 mg kg−1, i.p.)
completely prevented the induction of LTD by LFS-300 (bar) in animals
injected i.c.v. with soluble Aβ1–42 (hash)
(68.6±4.0% in the vehicle+Aβ group, n=5, P<0.05
compared with Pre, and compared with 98.4±7.6% in the MTEP+Aβ group, n=5,
P>0.05 compared with Pre; t-tests).
(c,d) Similarly, MTEP completely prevented the induction of LTD in
animals injected with Aβ-containing AD brain extract. As summarized
in (d) the EPSP measured 76.2±3.6% in the vehicle+AD group,
n=4, (P<0.05 compared with Pre, and compared with
97.4 ±5.6% in the MTEP+AD group, n=4, P>0.05 compared
with Pre; t-tests). (e,f) In contrast, the same dose of
MTEP that prevented
Aβ-facilitated LTD failed to significantly affect
control LTD induced by LFS-900 (72.0±4.4% in the vehicle+vehicle
group, n=11, P<0.05 compared with Pre, and
P>0.05 compared with 80.6±7.2% in the MTEP+vehicle group, n=5,
P<0.05 compared with Pre; t-tests).
(g,h) i.c.v. injection of soluble Aβ1–42 (hash), at the
dose that facilitated LTD, blocked LTP completely at 3 h post
HFS. Although systemic administration of MTEP
(3 mg kg−1) did not
affect HFS-induced control LTP, it prevented Aβ-mediated impairment of
LTP. As summarized in (h), HFS induced significant
(P<0.05 compared with Pre; paired t) LTP in the vehicle
control group (132.7±4.0%, n=5), MTEP+vehicle group
(131.5±5.2%, n=4) and MTEP+Aβ group (120.6±3.4%, n=8),
but not in the vehicle+Aβ group (96.2±4.7%, n=5),
which was significantly different from the other groups (one-way
ANOVA-Tukey). Values are mean±s.e.m. Calibration: vertical,
2 mV; horizontal, 10 ms.