Table. 2.
Comparison | Population | N | Sample Size | Test of association | M | test of heterogeneity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case | Control | ORa | 95%CIb | POR | x 2 | Pvalue c | I2(%) | |||||
C vs. T | overall | 3 | 956 | 1836 | 0.735 | 0.624 | 0.865 | 0.001 | F | 4.13 | 0.127 | 51.6 |
asian | 2 | 562 | 742 | 0.620 | 0.491 | 0.782 | 0.001 | F | 0.03 | 0.871 | 0.0 | |
european | 1 | 394 | 1094 | 0.870 | 0.690 | 1.096 | – | – | – | – | – | |
CC vs. TT | overall | 3 | 246 | 370 | 0.540 | 0.382 | 0.764 | 0.001 | F | 4.21 | 0.122 | 52.54 |
asian | 2 | 148 | 190 | 0.359 | 0.212 | 0.610 | 0.001 | F | 0.00 | 0.956 | 0.0 | |
european | 1 | 98 | 280 | 0.751 | 0.471 | 1.198 | 0.001 | – | – | – | – | |
CT vs. TT | overall | 3 | 364 | 562 | 0.735 | 0.555 | 0.972 | 0.031 | F | 3.30 | 0.192 | 39.5 |
asian | 2 | 207 | 249 | 0.552 | 0.363 | 0.893 | 0.005 | F | 0.02 | 0.889 | 0.0 | |
european | 1 | 157 | 413 | 0.933 | 0.637 | 1.367 | 0.031 | – | – | – | – | |
CT + CC vs. TT | overall | 3 | 478 | 818 | 0.618 | 0.396 | 0.966 | 0.035 | R | 4.67 | 0.097 | 57.2 |
asian | 2 | 281 | 371 | 0.458 | 0.325 | 0.722 | 0.001 | F | 0.12 | 0.732 | 0.0 | |
european | 1 | 197 | 547 | 0.873 | 0.609 | 1.251 | 0.035 | – | – | – | – | |
CCVS.TT + CT | overall | 3 | 478 | 818 | 0.659 | 0.502 | 0.864 | 0.003 | F | 1.51 | 0.469 | 0.0 |
asian | 2 | 281 | 371 | 0.566 | 0.392 | 0.819 | 0.002 | F | 0.15 | 0.701 | 0.0 | |
european | 1 | 197 | 547 | 0.785 | 0.527 | 1.169 | 0.003 | – | – | – | – |
a, OR odds ratio
b, 95 % confidence interval
c, Pvalue for heterogeneity based on Q test
M model of meta-analysis, F fixed-effects model, R random-effects model