Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 9;56(3):1618–1637. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15967

Table 7.

Correlation Between LMA Discordance Parameters and Global CTVF

Discordance Type
Discordance Subtype
Discordance Parameter
PValue*
R2
Sectoral† Focal BD min ratio 0.2656 0.0648
PD max ratio 0.6455 0.0114
CTVF min ratio 0.0008 0.4578
Axial/off-axial BD min ratio 0.4005 0.0375
PD max ratio 0.8989 0.0009
CTVF min ratio 0.0058 0.3368
Subsectoral‡ Focal BD CPR max ratio 0.5099 0.0231
PD CPR min ratio 0.8663 0.0015
CTVF CPR max ratio 0.0700 0.1625
Axial/off-axial BD CPR max ratio 0.3349 0.0490
PD CPR min ratio 0.5195 0.0222
CTVF CPR max ratio 0.0091 0.3077
Depth§ BD, PD, and CTVF inner/middle ratios NS||
BD, PD, and CTVF outer/middle ratios NS||

Bold indicates significant values.

*

P values < 0.005 (linear regression) are emphasized in the setting of multiple comparisons.

Data from both subsectors pooled together and ratios chosen to identify the sectoral location of least connective tissue density compared to all others.

Data from the central compared to the peripheral (C/P ratio or CPR) subsector of each sector; ratios chosen to identify the sectoral location where central connective tissue density is greatest and peripheral connective tissue density is least.

§

Data from the inner, middle, and outer laminar layers pooled together without regard for sectors or subsectors.

||

Inner/middle and outer/middle ratios were not significantly correlated to global CTVF for any parameter (data not shown).