Table 4.

Summary of significant regions from Maps 4 and 5.

Region	X	Y	Z	Volume	Regression vs. CARE		Regression vs. BIS		F-test
	(mm)			(mm3)	P	T	P	T	P	F
From Map 4: Emotional Valence Contrast vs CARE Scores with CARE > BIS									F-test CARE > BIS
Right occipital	27.0	−79.0	10.0	13365	0.0135	2.52	0.3657	0.91	<0.0001	21.07
dmCereb	3.0	−46.0	−2.0	13041	0.0254	2.27	0.7772	0.28	<0.0001	29.68
From Map 5: Emotional Valence Contrast vs BIS Scores with BIS > CARE									F-test BIS > CARE
dmPFC	0.0	44.0	43.0	20547	0.6023	−0.52	0.0190	−2.39	<0.0001	28.99
pgACC	−9.0	41.0	10.0	6912	0.2881	−1.07	0.0205	−2.35	<0.0001	25.55
Right pOFC	27.0	23.0	−20.0	1512	0.0470	−2.01	0.0208	−2.35	<0.0001	23.43
Right temp pole	30.0	26.0	−35.0	1296	0.0733	−1.81	0.0163	−2.44	<0.0001	16.08

Summary of significant regions from Maps 4 and 5. Map 4 tested comparison of fMRI emotional valence contrast (aversive - neutral distractors) vs. CARE scores where CARE scores also accounted for more variance than BIS scores. Map 5 tested regression of emotional valence contrast vs. BIS scores where BIS scores also accounted for more variance than CARE scores. X, Y, Z: MNI coordinates of region's peak statistical voxel. P- and t-values are median values across all voxels in each region (df = 98). F-test CARE > BIS values are median values across each region from the F-map testing whether CARE scores accounted for significantly more variance in emotional valence contrast values than BIS scores (df = 1, 97). F-test BIS > CARE shows median values from the F-map testing whether BIS scores accounted for significantly more variance in emotional valence contrast values than CARE scores (df = 1, 97). See Section 2.7 for details of analysis. Occipital: occipital cortex. dmCereb: dorsomedial cerebellum. dmPFC: dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. pgACC: perigenual anterior cingulate cortex. pOFC: posterior orbitofrontal cortex. Temp Pole: temporal pole.