Table 1.
Summary of contextual factors influencing the introduction of the rehabilitation guarantee as reported in one or several county councils
| Contextual factors reported to help the implementation process | |
| - | The financial incentive |
| - | Support from key stakeholders in facilitating and developing project organizations |
| - | The establishment and support of project organizations |
| - | Positive attitudes towards teams and teambuilding |
| - | Previous experiences from working with similar initiatives |
| Contextual factors reported to hinder the implementation process | |
| - | The project form, including annual renegotiations and narrow time window for implementation |
| - | Delayed decisions concerning criteria for selection and financial incentives |
| - | Unspecified treatment modalities |
| - | Lack of well-defined criteria for patient selection |
| - | Late introduction of time- and resource-intensive treatment |
| - | The lack of competence in PT at the clinical level |
| - | Recruitment difficulties |
| - | Negative attitudes to the choice of PTs included in the RG |
| - | Fragmentation of a comprehensive county primary care |
| - | Turnover of experienced physicians at the health care units hindering the possibility to work in well-functioning teams |