Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2014 Sep 15;27(1):21–30. doi: 10.1037/pas0000020

Table 3.

Fit Statistics for Invariance of GBI across Racial Groups

Model n χ2 Df p Δχ2 Δdf p CFI ΔCFI RMSEA RMSEA CI SRMR
1 GBI White Participants 985 1011.58 167 .00 - - - .938 - .072 067–.076 .041
2 GBI Black Participants 285 508.83 167 .00 - - - .934 - .085 .076–.093 .036
3 Configural Invariance 1270 1534.92 334 .00 - - - .937 - .075 .071–.079 .040
4 Weak Invariance 1270 1578.21 355 .00 35.98 21 .43 .936 −.001 .074 .070–.077 .068
5 Strong Invariance 1270 1674.99 373 .00 104.10 18 .09 .932 −.004 .074 .071–.078 .069
6 Strict Invariance 1270 2954.33 430 .00 1384.01 57 .00 .867 −.065 .096 .093–.099 .250
7* Invariant Factor Means 1270 1676.40 374 .00 1.41 1 .97 .932 0 .074 .070–.078 .069
8* Invariant Factor Variances 1270 1670.23 371 .00 4.76 2 .94 .932 0 .074 .071–.078 .045

Note.

*

Change in chi-square was calculated using the Satorra-Bentler Chi-Square difference test formula. Models 1 and 2 refer to the CFAs with White and Black participants, respectively.

*

Models 7 and 8 were evaluated relative to the strong (scalar) invariance model.