Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;10(3):e0118886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118886

Fig 3. Radial distribution for chromosomes 9–16 in six subjects in unexposed, H2O2 and UVB exposed lymphocytes.

Fig 3

Fig. 3 displays representative FISH images and the radial distribution for CTs 9–16. As in Fig. 2 moving from left to right the chromosome number is indicated followed by a representative FISH image for the CT and four histograms. Each histogram displays the proportion of fluorescence (%) from the nuclear interior toward the nuclear periphery (left to right). The first, second and third histogram displays the radial distribution for each CT in control, H2O2 and UVB exposed lymphocytes, respectively for each of the six subjects (1 to 6, left to right). The fourth histogram displays the average radial distribution for the six subjects in unexposed (blue), H2O2 (red) and UVB (green) exposed lymphocytes. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Roman numerals indicate significant inter-individual variations in radial distributions (p<0.05) between subjects in control lymphocytes: II- CT10 subjects 1, 4 and 5 (different to subjects 2, 3 and 6); III- CT12 subject 3 (different to subjects 1 and 5); IV- CT13 subject 6 (different to subject 1); V- CT15 subject 6 (different to subject 4).