Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2014 Sep;29(3):454–468. doi: 10.1037/a0036255

Table 3.

Results of 2 Rater Age (RA) × 2 Face Age (FA) × 2 (Face Attractiveness: Below/Above Median) ANOVAs on Accuracy Coefficientsa

Variable Below median
Above median
Main effect of median
Attractiveness by RA
Attractiveness by FA
M SE M SE F P F P F P
Doctors’ health score 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.03 13.79 <.001 0.70 .406 0.91 .343
Functional abilities 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.02 25.45 <.001 0.01 .950 1.17 .287
Physical fitness 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.02 7.33 .011 3.48 .072 11.51 .002
IQ scores −0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.32 .575 3.94 .052 1.31 .257
Vocabulary 0.13 0.03 0.10 0.02 0.38 .544 0.00 .990 1.22 .279
Reasoning 0.14 0.03 −0.01 0.03 12.24 .001 0.06 .802 14.04 .001
Processing speed 0.09 0.02 −0.01 0.03 8.49 .007 0.04 .846 30.85 <.001
STM 0.10 0.02 −0.05 0.03 13.18 .001 0.95 .338 0.01 .926
a

Mean accuracy coefficients are correlations between each participant’s ratings of older or younger faces above or below the median in attractiveness with the targets’ actual scores, controlling face sex and actual face age. For Doctors’ health score and IQ scores, df = 1, 62; for all other variables, df = 1, 30.