Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 21;71(Pt 3):346–353. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X15001351

Table 2. Summary of data-collection statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the outermost resolution shell.

Protein Tcid1 (PDB entry 4e7x) tCid1 (K133A/R137A/ R277A/K282A mutant) (crystal form I) tCid1 (K133A/R137A/ R277A/K282A mutant) (crystal form II) mCid1 (crystal form I) mCid1 (crystal form II)
Crystallization condition 15%(v/v) glycerol, 25.5%(w/v) PEG 4000, 0.17M ammonium acetate, 0.085M trisodium citrate pH 5.6 25%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.2M ammonium sulfate, 0.1M bis-tris pH 6.5 0.1M sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate pH 5.5, 18%(w/v) PEG 3350 or 16%(w/v) PEG 8000 10%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2M L-proline 10%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2M L-proline
Cryoprotectant 25%(v/v) glycerol Stepwise increase to 25%(v/v) glycerol 25%(v/v) glycerol Stepwise increase to 25%(v/v) glycerol 25%(v/v) ethylene glycol
Beamline I24, DLS I02, DLS I02, DLS I03, DLS I03, DLS
Wavelength () 0.973 0.9795 0.9795 0.963 0.963
Rotation per image () 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
X-ray detector PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M
Temperature (K) 100 100 100 100 100
Space group C2 P1 P21 C2 P21
a, b, c () 164.4, 78.0, 152.5 58.96, 62.26, 65.5 62.7, 103.7, 76.3 157.1, 54.85, 119.6 116, 53.18, 124.6
, , () 90, 109.5, 90 76.3, 81.1, 63.2 90, 110.8, 90 90, 125.6, 90 90, 115.2, 90
Resolution range () 64.243.20 (3.223.20) 30.171.73 (1.771.73) 33.772.51 (2.582.51) 58.392.25 (2.312.25) 112.722.37 (2.432.37)
Molecules per ASU§ 4 2 2 2 4
Solvent content (%) 54 49 54 52 42
Total No. of reflections 130475 284535 104007 131393 190479
No. of unique reflections 30013 81044 30865 39354 56461
Completeness (%) 99.5 (97.7) 96.3 (95.2) 98.3 (98.8) 99.2 (99.5) 99.9 (99.9)
Multiplicity 4.1 (4.1) 3.5 (3.4) 3.4 (3.5) 3.3 (3.4) 3.4 (3.4)
I/(I) 8.9 (2.4) 16.7 (2.0) 22.6 (2.1) 15.3 (2.5) 8.3 (1.9)
R merge †† 0.138 (0.712) 0.028 (0.528) 0.032 (0.531) 0.041 (0.494) 0.115 (0.630)

Data for comparative purposes taken from Yates et al. (2012).

Cryoprotectant was added to the reservoir solution of the crystallization experiment to the final concentration stated.

§

The number of molecules in the asymmetric unit (ASU) was confirmed by molecular replacement using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007) and PDB entry 4e7x.

Solvent content calculated using the Matthews coefficient calculator (Weichenberger Rupp, 2014; Matthews, 1968). The molecular weight was derived from the sequences given in Table 1.

††

R merge = 100 Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the ith measurement and I(hkl) is the weighted mean of all measurements of I(hkl) for the reflection with Miller indices hkl.