Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 21;71(Pt 3):346–353. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X15001351

Table 2. Summary of data-collection statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the outermost resolution shell.

Protein Tcid1 (PDB entry 4e7x)† tCid1 (K133A/R137A/ R277A/K282A mutant) (crystal form I) tCid1 (K133A/R137A/ R277A/K282A mutant) (crystal form II) mCid1 (crystal form I) mCid1 (crystal form II)
Crystallization condition 15%(v/v) glycerol, 25.5%(w/v) PEG 4000, 0.17M ammonium acetate, 0.085M trisodium citrate pH 5.6 25%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.2M ammonium sulfate, 0.1M bis-tris pH 6.5 0.1M sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate pH 5.5, 18%(w/v) PEG 3350 or 16%(w/v) PEG 8000 10%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2M L-proline 10%(w/v) PEG 3350, 0.1M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2M L-proline
Cryoprotectant‡ 25%(v/v) glycerol Stepwise increase to 25%(v/v) glycerol 25%(v/v) glycerol Stepwise increase to 25%(v/v) glycerol 25%(v/v) ethylene glycol
Beamline I24, DLS I02, DLS I02, DLS I03, DLS I03, DLS
Wavelength () 0.973 0.9795 0.9795 0.963 0.963
Rotation per image () 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
X-ray detector PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M PILATUS 6M
Temperature (K) 100 100 100 100 100
Space group C2 P1 P21 C2 P21
a, b, c () 164.4, 78.0, 152.5 58.96, 62.26, 65.5 62.7, 103.7, 76.3 157.1, 54.85, 119.6 116, 53.18, 124.6
, , () 90, 109.5, 90 76.3, 81.1, 63.2 90, 110.8, 90 90, 125.6, 90 90, 115.2, 90
Resolution range () 64.243.20 (3.223.20) 30.171.73 (1.771.73) 33.772.51 (2.582.51) 58.392.25 (2.312.25) 112.722.37 (2.432.37)
Molecules per ASU§ 4 2 2 2 4
Solvent content (%) 54 49 54 52 42
Total No. of reflections 130475 284535 104007 131393 190479
No. of unique reflections 30013 81044 30865 39354 56461
Completeness (%) 99.5 (97.7) 96.3 (95.2) 98.3 (98.8) 99.2 (99.5) 99.9 (99.9)
Multiplicity 4.1 (4.1) 3.5 (3.4) 3.4 (3.5) 3.3 (3.4) 3.4 (3.4)
I/(I) 8.9 (2.4) 16.7 (2.0) 22.6 (2.1) 15.3 (2.5) 8.3 (1.9)
R merge †† 0.138 (0.712) 0.028 (0.528) 0.032 (0.531) 0.041 (0.494) 0.115 (0.630)
†

Data for comparative purposes taken from Yates et al. (2012 ▶).

‡

Cryoprotectant was added to the reservoir solution of the crystallization experiment to the final concentration stated.

§

The number of molecules in the asymmetric unit (ASU) was confirmed by molecular replacement using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007 ▶) and PDB entry 4e7x.

Solvent content calculated using the Matthews coefficient calculator (Weichenberger Rupp, 2014 ▶; Matthews, 1968 ▶). The molecular weight was derived from the sequences given in Table 1 ▶.

††

R merge = 100 Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the ith measurement and I(hkl) is the weighted mean of all measurements of I(hkl) for the reflection with Miller indices hkl.