Table 3.
Split-plot-factor | Tiller density (/m2) | Leaf blade dry mass (g/m2) | Stem & sheath dry mass (g/m2) | Root dry mass (g/m2) | Root:shoot ratio | Total dry mass (g/m2) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Ambient | FACE | Siga | Ambient | FACE | Siga | Ambient | FACE | Siga | Ambient | FACE | Siga | Ambient | FACE | Siga | Ambient | FACE | Siga | |
AT | 471 | 554 | b | 112 | 131 | b | 138 | 164 | b | 54 | 58 | a | 0.22 | 0.20 | a | 304 | 353 | b |
ET | 535 | 586 | b | 139 | 157 | c | 158 | 192 | c | 59 | 65 | a | 0.20 | 0.19 | a | 355 | 414 | c |
LN | 393 | 422 | a | 84 | 94 | a | 110 | 132 | a | 54 | 60 | a | 0.28 | 0.26 | b | 248 | 286 | a |
Analysis of Variance Results | ||||||||||||||||||
CO2 | + (0.082) | + (0.063) | * | ns (0.186) | ns (0.31) | * | ||||||||||||
Split-factor (S) | *** | *** | *** | ns | ** | *** | ||||||||||||
CO2 x S | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
The split-plot factors followed by the same letters in each column were not significantly different (P>0.05) by the Tukey’s method.
indicate that the effects were significant at P<0.05, P<0.01 and P<0.001, respectively.