Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov;25(4 0 1):1171–1186. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000448

Table 6. Total maladjustment and prediction of conversion to psychosis versus nonconversion.

Predictors Parameter Estimates

β SE β Wald p HR (eβ) 95% CI (eβ)
Model 1 (n = 247)
 Baseline year −0.20 0.06 10.66 .001 0.82 0.73–0.92
 Childhood total adj. 0.01 0.13 0.00 .953 1.01 0.78–1.31
 Early adoles. total adj. 0.11 0.13 0.71 .398 1.12 0.87–1.44
Model 2 (n = 141)
 Baseline year −0.16 0.07 5.09 .024 0.85 0.74–0.98
 Childhood total adj. 0.06 0.14 0.21 .651 1.06 0.81–1.39
 Early adoles. total adj. 0.16 0.15 1.27 .260 1.18 0.89–1.57
Model 3 (n = 141)
 Baseline year −0.16 0.07 4.92 .027 0.85 0.74–0.98
 Childhood total adj. 0.06 0.14 0.18 .671 1.06 0.81–1.39
 Early adoles. total adj. 0.10 0.20 0.24 .622 1.11 0.74–1.65
 Late adoles. total adj. 0.09 0.21 0.20 .656 1.10 0.73–1.64

Note: The reference group is nonconversion, and the method is forced entry. A Cox regression analysis was performed using standardized Premorbid Adjustment Scale ratings. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.