Table 5. Program Benchmarks completed and dates completed by condition.
DD.com only n=156 |
DD.com + MI n=156* |
||
---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | Chi Squared Test | |
Completed Cores 0-5 | 108 (69.2%) | 119 (76.3%) | X2=.50, ns |
Completed Cores 0-4 | 116 (74.4%) | 124 (79.5%) | X2=2.45(p=.12) |
Completed Cores 0-3 | 128 (82.1%) | 136 (87.2%) | X2=.15, ns |
Completed Cores 0-2 | 142 (91.0%) | 147 (94.2%) | X2=.01, ns |
Completed Cores 0-1 | 148 (94.9%) | 154 (98.7%) | X2=.89, ns |
Completed Core 0 | 152 (97.4%) | 154 (98.7%) | X2=.12, ns |
Completed no Cores | 4 (2.6%) | 2 (1.3%) | X2=.12, ns |
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | t-test+ | |
---|---|---|---|
# Cores completed | 5.1 (1.6) | 5.3 (1.3) | ns |
Core 4 completion day | 80.9 (85.8) | 60.6 (47.3) | t=-2.29, p = 0.03 |
Daily Progress Notes (DPNs) Completed Core 2 | 4.7 (2.7) | 4.7 (3.0) | ns |
DPNs Core 3 | 4.6 (3.2) | 4.3 (2.5) | ns |
DPNs Core 4 | 4.0 (3.0) | 4.0 (2.7) | ns |
DPNs Core 5 | 2.3 (1.7) | 2.6 (1.7) | ns |
MDD 1 completion day | 148 (93) | 124 (41) | t=-2.74,p = 0.01 |
MDD 2 completion day | 180 (89) | 157 (54) | t =-2.58, p = 0.02 |
MDD 3 completion day | 210 (87) | 190 (59) | t =-2.12, p = 0.04 |
MDD 4 completion day | 238 (82) | 220 (53) | t =-2.02, p = 0.05 |
MDD 5 completion day | 268 (79) | 248 (46) | t =-2.40,p = 0.02 |
MDD 6 completion day | 298 (75) | 278 (43) | t =-2.48, p = 0.02 |
MDD 7 completion day | 323 (66) | 308 (42) | t=-2.14,p = 0.04 |
MDD 8 completion day | 353 (58) | 336 (34) | t =-2.86, p = 0.005 |
MDD 9 completion day | 377 (47) | 365 (28) | t =-2.55, p = 0.02 |
MDD 10 completion day | 404 (37) | 392 (22) | t =-2.94, p = 0.004 |
MDD 11 completion day | 428 (27) | 424 (20) | t=-1.41,p = 0.16 |
MDD 12 completion day | 454 (18) | 450 (14) | t=-1.99,p = 0.05 |
MDD 15 completion day | 468 (7) | 467 (5) | t =-0.97, p = 0.33 |
For these analyses, only the 156 DD.com plus MI participants who had an MI session were included.
Due to inequality of variances, these t-tests required Satterthwaite corrections (Moser, Stevens, & Watts, 1989).