Table 2.
Prospective trials of tacrolimus in myasthenia gravis.
Clinical situation | Study | Design | Population | Dosage | Duration | Efficacy measures | Results‡ | Adverse effects (% of patients) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steroid-sparing effects | Shimojima et al. [2006] | Open-label, single center | n = 7 | 3 mg/day | 6–32 months | Mean ∆ QMGS at 3, 6 months | ↓4.2*,↓5.0* | No notable adverse effects |
Mean ∆ MG-ADL at 3, 6 months | ↓1.3*,↓2.0* | |||||||
∆ Anti-AChR AB | ↓¶ | |||||||
Nagaishi et al. [2008] | Open-label, single center | n = 10 | 3 mg/day | 1–5 years | Mean ∆ MG-ADL at 1, 6 months | ↓3 (1-4), ↓5.8 (4–12)§ | No serious adverse effects | |
PSC-MGFA | 1 PR, 4 MM, 2 exacerbations § | 2 discontinuations after 1 month due to new diabetes mellitus and diarrhea | ||||||
Tada et al. [2006] | Open-label, single center | n = 9 | 3 mg/day | 24–46 months | QMGS ∆ at 3, 6, 12 months | ↓2.6*, ↓3.0$, ↓3.2$ | No serious adverse effects | |
3 point ↓ in QMGS at 3, 6 monthsMean ∆ Anti-AChR AB at 6 months | 66.7%, 77.8% of patients§↓51.6 nM* | Hemoglobin A1C increase and lymphocyte reduction (33%) | ||||||
Konishi et al. [2003] | Open-label, multicenter | n = 19 | 3 mg/day | 16 weeks | Median ∆ in MG score at 16 weeks | ↓4$ | No serious adverse effects | |
MG-ADL score ∆ at 12, 16 weeks3 point ↓ in MG score | ↓*¶37% of patients§ | Increased neutrophil count and decreased lymphocyte count (37%) | ||||||
1 point ↓ in ADL score | 42% of patients§ | |||||||
Median ∆ Anti-AChR AB at 12, 16 weeks | ↓2.8 nM*, ↓2.1 nM* | |||||||
Median ∆ IL-2 production at 16 weeks | ↓8.5 U/ml $ | |||||||
Konishi et al. [2005] | Open-label extension | n = 12 | 2–4.5 mg/day | 2 years | 3 point ↓ in MG score1 point ↓ in MG-ADL score | 41.7% of patients§50% of patients§ | Minor (66.7%), increased neutrophil count and decreased lymphocyte count (33%) | |
Mean ∆ Anti-AChR ABMean ∆ prednisolone dose | ↓7.5 nM$↓37% (8.3–57.0%)§ | Drug held for headache/eye pain in 1 patient, later resumed | ||||||
Zhao et al. [2011] | Open-label, multicenter pilot study | n = 47 | 3 mg/day | 24 weeks | Median ∆ QMGSMedian ∆ MMT scoreMedian ∆ MG-ADLMedian ∆ prednisone dose | ↓5.34 ±4.79$↓14.7 ±14.02$↓4.75 ±4.30$↓11.8 mg/day$ | Hyperlipidemia (18%), hyperglycemia (12%), diarrhea (12%), respiratory infection (12%) 1 death due to MG exacerbation 9 days into study, not attributed to tacrolimus |
|
Yoshikawa et al. [2011] | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter | n = 80 | 3 mg/day | 28 weeks | Mean prednisolone dose, ITTMean prednisolone dose, PPQMGS | 4.91±4.04 versus 6.51±4.89 mg/day4.45±3.44 versus 6.19±4.77 mg/day*4.4±3.62 versus 5.8±5.09 | Nasopharyngitis (25 versus 30%), WBC elevation (12.5 versus 5%), URI (12.5 versus 5%), A1C increase (10 versus 2.5%), muscle spasm (10 versus 0%) | |
MG-ADLMean ∆ Anti-AChR AB | 1.2±1.33 versus 2.3±3.0No ∆¶ | 2 serious events: 1 appendicitis and 1 hearing loss which resolved with treatment | ||||||
Mean ∆ IL-2 production | No ∆¶ | 2 discontinuations for appendicitis and insomnia | ||||||
Corticosteroid with cyclosporine failure | Ponseti et al. 2005a | Open-label, single center | n = 13 | 0.1 mg/kg/day | 1 year | Median ∆ QMGSMean ∆ Anti-AChR AB | ↓20.93$↓6.6 nM* | No notable adverse effects |
PSC-MGFA | 13 PR§ | |||||||
Mean ∆TEMS | ↑26.53$ | |||||||
Ponseti et al. 2005b | Open-label, single center | n = 79 | 0.1 mg/kg/day | 2.5 years | Mean ∆ prednisolone doseWithdrawal of steroidsMean ∆ QMGSMean ∆ Anti-AChR ABPSC-MGFA, % of patientsMean ∆ TEMS | ↓56.5 mg/day. §77 patients. §↓20.2$↓34.8 nM. $CSR 5.1%, PR 88.6%, MM 6.4%↑26.8$ |
3 new malignancies, included 2 patients with lung cancer and 1 with renal cancer (after 4 to 6 months of treatment) | |
Postoperative thymectomy | Ponseti et al. [2006] | Open-label, single center | n = 49 | 0.1 mg/kg/day | 6–60 months | Withdrawal of steroids at 1, 2 yearsMean ∆ prednisone doseMean ∆ QMGSMean ∆ Anti-AChR ABPSC-MGFA, % of patientsMean ∆ TEMS | 93.7%, 100% of patients§↓80.7 mg/day§↓20.7$↓20.8 nM§CSR 33%, PR 62.6%, MM 4%§↑24§ | Hypomagnesemia (23.7%), paresthesia (5.3%), tremor (5.3%) |
De novo diagnosis | Nagane et al. [2005] | Randomized, controlled, single center | n = 34 | 3 mg/day | 1 year | Early phase:Number of PLEX + HMP treatmentsMean oral prednisolone doseFollow-up phase:Number of PLEX + HMP treatmentsHMPMean oral prednisolone dose | 1.3±1.5 versus 3.1±2.3*5.1±4.1 versus 6.7±3.0 mg/day0.2±0.5 versus 1.1±1.6*0.4±0.9 versus 1.8±2.7*4.6±4.1 versus 8.1±2.6 mg/day* | No significant adverse effectsSerum creatine increased from 0.4–1.1 mg/dl to 1.4–1.5 mg/dl in 1 patient |
Presence of thymoma | Mitsui et al. [2007] | Open-label, controlled, single center | n = 10 | 3 mg/day | 3 months | ∆ QMGS at 1, 3 monthsBaseline anti-AChR ABAnti-AChR AB at 1moAnti-AChR AB at 3 months | ↓*||,¶68.16±36.4 versus 16.5±7.8 nM53.8±30.9 versus 16.5±8.3 nM79.2±53.9 versus 15.25±5.2 nM | No notable adverse effects |
Anti-AChR AB= anti-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antibody titer; CSR= complete stable remission; HMP= high dose intravenous methylprednisolone; IL-2= interleukin-2; ITT= intention to treat; MG= myasthenia gravis; MG-ADL= Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living; MM= minimal manifestation; MMT= Manual Muscle Testing; PLEX= plasma exchange; PP= per protocol; PR= pharmacologic remission; PSC-MGFA= Post-Intervention Status Criteria, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America; QMGS= Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score; TEMS= Test to Evaluate Muscle Strength; URI= upper respiratory inflammation.
p < 0.05
p ⩽ 0.01
For comparisons of tacrolimus versus placebo or, if no comparator used, for final results versus baseline.
p values not reported.
Thymoma versus nonthymoma group
Specific values not reported.