Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;16(3):208–214. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1500017

Table 2.

Delivery access, type, and size of implanted valves

Variable Case number*
P-value
Total (n=40) BAV (n=15) TAV (n=25)
Access
 CoreValve 29 (72.5%) 10 (66.7%) 19 (76.0%) 0.78
  Transfemoral 27 (67.5%) 10 (66.7%) 17 (68.0%) 1.00
  Transubclavian 1 (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.0%) 1.00
  Transaortic 1 (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.0%) 1.00
 VANUS A 11 (27.5%) 5 (33.3%) 6 (24.0%) 0.78
  Transfemoral 9 (22.5%) 3 (20.0%) 6 (24.0%) 1.00
  Transubclavian 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1.00
  Transaortic 2 (5.0%) 2 (13.3%) 0 (0%) 0.14
 Transfemoral access TOTAL 36 (90.0%) 13 (86.7%) 23 (92.0%) 1.00
Valve size
 CoreValve
  23 mm 1 (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.0%) 1.00
  26 mm 5 (12.5%) 1 (6.7%) 4 (16.0%) 0.71
  29 mm 19 (47.5%) 9 (60.0%) 10 (40.0%) 0.22
  31 mm 4 (10.0%) 0 (0%) 4 (16.0%) 0.28
 VANUS A
  23 mm 1 (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.0%) 1.00
  26 mm 3 (7.5%) 2 (13.3%) 1 (4.0%) 0.64
  29 mm 6 (15.0%) 3 (20.0%) 3 (12.0%) 0.82
  32 mm 1 (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1 (4.0%) 1.00
*

Data are expressed as number (percentage)

BAV: bicuspid aortic valve; TAV: tricuspid aortic valve