Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 20;44(3):166–177. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0554-3

Table 4.

Characteristics of respondents determining importance (I) and IDS scores for groups of values tested

Non-use (I, IDS) Use (I, IDS) Industry (I, IDS) Indigenous (I, IDS) Bragging (I, IDS)
Male −, − +, + −, − −, −
Education +, + −, − −, °
Single −, − +, ° +, +
Age −, − −, −
Household income +, ° −, −
Indigenous +, +
Born in QLD −, −
Household size
Main household income from:
 Mining +, + °, + −, −
 Fishing +, ° +, °
 Government °, + −, °
 Tourism +, °
 Agriculture
 Adjusted R 2 .030, .026 .043, .042 .027, .021 .086, .059 .043, .028

Mining mining, manufacturing and ports, Fishing commercial fishing, Government government services including education, health etc., Tourism accommodations, cafes and restaurants; retail and tourism, Agriculture agriculture and forestry main income source

A plus-sign indicates that the variable was found to have a positive, and statistically significant relationship with the score assigned to the corresponding value; a negative sign indicates the relationship was negative and statistically significant; a blank or ° indicates no statistically significant relationship