Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Carbon N Y. 2014 Nov 1;78:26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.033

Table 1.

Characterisation of MWCNTs.

CNT format* Length#
(TEM)
Diameter#
(TEM)
Surface Area
(BET)
Carbon purity
(EDX)
Zeta Potential
(Zetasizer Nano)
MWCNT-0.6 µm in DW 1.1 µm (0.23 – 9.7 µm) 30.6 nm (19.5 – 47.6 nm) 255.24 m2/g 87% −19.0 mV
MWCNT-0.6 µm in DCCM-1 NA NA NA NA −13.2 mV
MWCNT-3 µm in DW 4.3 µm (0.5 – 24.4 µm) 33.3 nm (22.6 – 45.8 nm) 213.64 m2/g 93% −13.4 mV
MWCNT-3 µm in DCCM-1 NA NA NA NA −15.7 mV
MWCNT-20 µm in DW 19.3 µm (0.6 – 30.8 µm) 27.8 nm (15.6 – 41.9 nm) 204.8 m2/g 95% −18.7 mV
MWCNT-20 µm in DCCM-1 NA NA NA NA −12.0 mV

DW: Deionised water

DCCM-1: Cell culture medium

TEM: Transmission electron microscopy

BET: Brunauer, Emmett and Teller analysis

EDX: Energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy

NA: Not applicable

*

There was no physical difference between MWCNTs suspended in DW or DCCM-1

#

Means were calculated from lengths with count frequencies greater than 5% of the total counts

The nominal length is that is provided by the manufacturer and is that used throughout the article.