Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 12;81(7):2455–2465. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03903-14

TABLE 1.

Proportions of bacterial taxa significantly influenced by dietary treatments

Taxonomic group Mean % bacterial abundance ± SDc
P value determined by ANOVA
Standard diet Control HF diet Prebiotic (HF) Probiotic (HF) Synbiotic (HF)
Phyla
    Firmicutes 87.6 ± 5 A 88.8 ± 9 A 76.9 ± 8 A 87.8 ± 5 A 59.3 ± 7 B <0.0001
    Actinobacteria 8.9 ± 6 AB 3.6 ± 2 A 19.6 ± 8 BC 7.6 ± 4 A 39.1 ± 7 C <0.0001
Families
    Clostridiaceae 3.9 ± 6 0.5 ± 1 0.8 ± 1 5.4 ± 6 A 0.2 ± 0 B 0.0061
    Incertae sedis XIV 3.7 ± 6 7.5 ± 10 11.0 ± 15 1.1 ± 2 A 17.3 ± 12 B 0.0342
    Streptococcaceae 12.7 ± 5 21.3 ± 5 A 9.3 ± 1 8.9 ± 6 B 6.6 ± 2 B 0.0045
    Erysipelotrichaceae 16.8 ± 11 21.3 ± 17 9.2 ± 1 A 26.5 ± 10 B 8.3 ± 3 A 0.0226
    Bifidobacteriaceae 5.9 ± 7 A 1.3 ± 1 A 17.0 ± 9 4.1 ± 2 A 37.8 ± 7 B 0.0017
    Coriobacteriaceae 0.6 ± 0 0.3 ± 0 1.0 ± 1 1.9 ± 3 A 0.2 ± 0 B 0.0263
    Rikenellaceae 0.9 ± 1 A 0.1 ± 0 0.3 ± 0 0.1 ± 0 0.0 ± 0 B 0.0181
Genera
    Clostridium 3.9 ± 6 0.5 ± 1 A 0.8 ± 1 5.3 ± 6 B 0.2 ± 0 A 0.0122
    Blautia 3.4 ± 6 7.4 ± 10 11.0 ± 15 0.9 ± 1 A 17.2 ± 12 B 0.0431
    Holdemania 0.1 ± 0 1.0 ± 2 A 0.9 ± 0 0.0 ± 0 B 0.0 ± 0 B 0.0117
    Bifidobacterium 5.9 ± 7 A 1.3 ± 1 A 17.0 ± 9 4.1 ± 2 A 37.8 ± 7 B 0.0017
    Lactococcus 12.4 ± 4 21.0 ± 5 A 9.1 ± 1 8.7 ± 6 B 6.3 ± 2 B 0.0045
    Alistipes 0.9 ± 1 A 0.1 ± 0 0.3 ± 0 0.1 ± 0 0.0 ± 0 B 0.0181
OTUsa
    OTU_2 (B. adolescentis, 99%) 0.0 ± 0 A 0.0 ± 0 A 0.0 ± 0 A 3.4 ± 2 BC 37.0 ± 7 BD <0.0001
    OTU_1 (L. lactis, 100%) 12.4 ± 4 21.0 ± 5 A 9.1 ± 1 8.6 ± 6 B 6.3 ± 2 B 0.0045
    OTU_626 (Lachnospiraceaeb) 0.4 ± 1 A 0.1 ± 0 A 0.0 ± 0 B ND 0.1 ± 0 0.0002
    OTU_7 (Turicibacter sanguinis, 97%) 3.7 ± 3 2.3 ± 3 2.3 ± 2 9.1 ± 7 A 0.5 ± 1 B 0.0279
    OTU_14 (Blautiab) 0.0 ± 0 A 0.1 ± 0 AB 1.5 ± 1 BC 0.0 ± 0 AB 9.7 ± 6 CD 0.0003
    OTU_33 (L. intestinalis, 99%) ND 0.0 ± 0 A ND 1.1 ± 2 B 0.0 ± 0 A 0.0022
    OTU_9 (Clostridium sp.b) 3.8 ± 6 0.5 ± 1 A 0.7 ± 1 5.3 ± 6 B 0.2 ± 0 A 0.0128
    OTU_6 (B. pseudolongum, 97%) 5.8 ± 7 0.9 ± 1 16.6 ± 8 A 0.6 ± 1 0.0 ± 0 B 0.0293
    OTU_44 (Clostridium cocleatum, 99%) ND 1.0 ± 1 A ND 0.0 ± 0 B ND 0.0121
a

Percent homologies to the closest type strain in the database are shown in parentheses. If the strain could not be assigned to a type strain (<97% homology), RDP Classifier was used to determine the most likely genus, and the RDP Classifier value is shown (80% cutoff).

b

OTU without closely related type strain (<97% homology) classified with RDP Classifier.

c

Values with different uppercase letters are significantly different from each other. HF, high fat; ND, not detected.