Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 12;81(7):2384–2394. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03269-14

TABLE 2.

Overview of pyrosequencing data sets for 16S rRNA and cbbM transcripts after normalizationa

Sample and mo Gene No. of sequences Coverage Inverse Simpson's index (1/D) No. of observed OTUs No. of estimated OTUs (chao) No. of rare OTUs (singletons) Shannon index
H4-3 Nov 16S rRNA 7,317 0.92 9.16 797 3,062 727 (610) 3.36
H4-3 Apr 16S rRNA 7,317 0.92 13.79 784 2,612 695 (571) 3.74
H4-1 Nov 16S rRNA 7,317 0.95 4.27 539 1,755 479 (395) 2.65
H4-1 Apr 16S rRNA 7,317 0.94 6.04 644 1,940 555 (453) 3.19
H5-1 Nov 16S rRNA 7,317 0.96 3.85 401 1,268 355 (289) 2.28
H5-1 Apr 16S rRNA 7,317 0.85 60.25 1,537 5,301 1,341 (1,115) 5.46
H4-3 Nov cbbM 4,830 0.99 10.21 97 250 64 (53) 2.81
H4-3 Apr cbbM 4,830 0.99 1.61 63 141 47 (38) 0.97
H4-1 Nov cbbM 4,830 0.99 7.78 95 195 58 (43) 2.59
H4-1 Apr cbbM 4,830 0.99 1.97 71 102 45 (30) 1.41
H5-1 Nov cbbM 4,830 0.99 5.95 93 159 59 (42) 2.32
H5-1 Apr cbbM 4,830 0.99 4.50 60 192 41 (33) 1.97
a

Sequence distance cutoffs for OTU assignment were 0.03 (nucleic acid level) for 16S rRNA genes and 0.05 (protein level) for cbbM.