Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;4(3):169–180. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.27

Table 10 . Predicted preference impact (percentage) of retention strategy packages for medical students .

Potential retention strategy Salary increase
+0% +25% +50% +75%
Package A
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 97.34% 98.64% 99.30% 99.65%
Reassignment to urban area after 3 years in rural post
Provide good housing
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service
Package B
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 95.94% 97.91% 98.93% 99.46%
Reassignment to urban area after 3 years in rural post
Provide good housing
Package C
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 93.21% 96.43% 98.24% 99.07%
Provide good housing
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service
Package D
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 92.12% 95.85% 97.85% 98.92%
Reassignment to urban area after 3 years in rural post
Package E
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 89.82% 94.57% 97.17% 98.57%
Provide good housing
Package F
Reassignment to urban area after 3 years in rural post 89.38% 94.32% 97.04% 98.50%
Provide good housing
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service
Package G
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 87.07% 93.00% 96.33% 98.14%
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service
Package H
Ensure adequate and functional health facility infrastructure 81.32% 89.52% 94.43% 97.10%
Package I
Provide good housing 75.80% 86.08% 92.43% 96.01%
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service
Package J
Provide good housing 66.95% 79.97% 88.76% 94.06%
Package K
Preferential admission for in-service training after 4 years rural service 60.73% 75.32% 85.77% 92.36%