Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;9:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00126

Table 2.

Characteristics of the final stimuli.

Motion metaphor Motion literal Auditory metaphor Auditory literal
M SD M SD M SD M SD
Sentence
Cloze probability 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.07
Familiarity (1–7 scale) 4.03 1.02 5.19 1.02 3.84 1.23 5.24 0.74
Imageability (1–7 scale) 3.99 0.85 5.73 0.87 4.04 0.88 4.96 0.75
Figurativeness (1–7 scale) 5.47 0.75 2.20 0.80 5.35 0.68 2.30 0.71
Valence (% positive) 0.29 0.32 0.29 0.28 0.26 0.32 0.16 0.26
Valence RT (ms) 1498 188 1512 195 1485 271 1391 199
Pilot accuracy (%) 0.69 0.22 0.81 0.20 0.60 0.23 0.80 0.20
Pilot RT (ms) 1314 931 853 455 1446 771 996 830
# characters 31.0 3.8 30.4 4.1 31.0 4.4 29.7 4.2
# words 6.1 0.5 6.0 0.4 6.0 0.5 5.9 0.4
# content words 3.1 0.4 3.0 0.4 3.0 0.5 2.9 0.4
KF frequency 79 100 72 95 60 82 90 146
BN frequency 78 96 76 163 75 147 96 150
Concreteness (0–700 scale) 421 63 433 52 441 66 418 63
Target word
#characters 5.1 1.3 (same as motion metaphor) 5.5 1.6 (same as auditory metaphor)
KF frequency 10 32 18 38
BN frequency 10 21 28 68
Concreteness (100–700 scale) 451 52 457 62

KF frequency = frequency value from Kučera and Francis (1967). BN frequency = SUBTLEX frequency value from Brysbaert and New (2009). Familiarity, Imageability and Valence reflect ratings of the entire sentence. Frequency and Concreteness ratings reflect the mean value of all content words in each sentence. Since concreteness ratings are based on published norms of individual words, they do not necessarily reflect the concreteness or imageability of the sentence as a whole. Valence ratings were binary; subjects rated sentences as positive or neutral/negative.