Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;9:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00126

Table 3.

Comparison of final stimuli across modality and figurativeness conditions.

Modality Figurativeness
Motion metaphor/Auditory metaphor Motion literal/Auditory literal Motion literal/Motion metaphor Auditory literal/Auditory metaphor
t Sig. t Sig. t Sig. t Sig.
Sentence
Cloze probability ns ns ns ns
Familiarity ns ns 5.66 <0.001 6.91 <0.001
Imageability ns 4.74 <0.001 10.13 <0.001 5.63 <0.001
Figurativeness ns ns −20.95 <0.001 −21.98 <0.001
Valence ns 2.4 0.02 ns ns
Valence RT ns 3.1 0.003 ns 1.99 0.05
Pilot accuracy 1.95 0.055 ns 2.92 0.004 4.59 <0.001
Pilot RT ns ns −3.14 0.002 −2.81 0.006
# characters ns ns ns ns
# words ns ns ns ns
# content words ns ns ns ns
KF frequency ns ns ns ns
BN frequency ns ns ns ns
Concreteness ns ns ns ns
Target word
#characters ns ns n/a n/a
KF frequency ns ns n/a n/a
BN frequency ns ns n/a n/a
Concreteness ns ns n/a n/a

Degrees of freedom = 98 for each t-test. ns = non-significant, p < 0.05 (two-tailed). See the legend for Table 2 for information about the items listed.