Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0120199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120199

Table 4. Association between railway noise exposure at time of SF-36 and PCS/MCS.

Model 1 a Estimate (95% CI) Model 2 b Estimate (95% CI) Model 3 c Estimate (95% CI)
Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Not exposed 0.00 (ref) 0.00 (ref) 0.00 (ref)
< 55 dB -0.06 (-0.30, 0.18) 0.02 (-0.21, 0.26) 0.08 (-0.15, 0.31)
≥ 55 dB -0.42 (-0.75, -0.09) -0.17 (-0.49, 0.16) -0.17 (-0.49, 0.14)
Linear trend, per 10 dB -0.26 (-0.49, -0.03) -0.12 (-0.35, 0.11) -0.15 (-0.38, 0.07)
Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Not exposed 0.00 (ref) 0.00 (ref) 0.00 (ref)
< 55 dB -0.26 (-0.50, -0.01) -0.16 (-0.40, 0.09) -0.12 (-0.36, 0.13)
≥ 55 dB -0.56 (-0.88, -0.21) -0.33 (-0.67, 0.00) -0.32 (-0.66, 0.01)
Linear trend, per 10 dB -0.18 (-0.41, 0.06) -0.08 (-0.31, 0.15) -0.10 (-0.33, 0.13)

aAdjusted for age, sex

bAdjusted for Model 1plus education, cohabitance status, income and railway noise

cAdjusted for Model 2 plus smoking status, waist circumference, and alcohol intake

We investigated effect modification for MSC and PSC by sex, age, education, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and train noise exposure, but found no significant interactions (all p ≥ 0.14, results not shown).